Anything PE shops can do, pension funds can do better

Index funds are a smarter bet than mutual funds for retail investors, just because their fees are lower. So why do big institutional investors invest in private-equity companies which charge enormous fees, and which in turn hire investment banks which charge their own enormous fees, rather than simply buying companies themselves?

Ontario Teachers Pension Plan seems to have decided that enough is enough — and has decided it’s going to make its own bid for BCE (a/k/a Bell Canada). Private-equity shops such as Providence Equity Partners might be invited to join the buyout party, but then again so are real-money investors such as Caisse de Dépôt et Placement du Québec and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, according to the NYT.

This is very much a welcome development: it shows that institutional investors are beginning to realize that their own investing skills have a pretty good chance of outperforming any PE or hedge fund, once those enormous fees are taken into account. (Hedge funds do generate alpha; they just pay nearly all of it to themselves in the form of fees.) So whether or not the BCE takeover ever happens, an important precedent has already been set. Pension funds can be in deals from the beginning, rather than being brought in at the end to provide that last chunk of equity finance.

This entry was posted in Econoblog. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Anything PE shops can do, pension funds can do better

  1. Gari N. Corp says:

    Teachers has been doing this for a while. It bought a power company called InterGen a year or two back, and recently bought the US and Canadian port operations of Orient & Overseas, though I’ll grant you that buying a ginormous telco is an order of magnitude and difficulty greater.

  2. Thomas Tange says:

    And there compelling reasons: as every other PE fund reach the $20b mark, pension funds’ allocation to these giga PE funds have also been balooning. It’s not hard to find a pension fund around committing an additional US$1b or more a year to PE funds. And that’s $20m a year of aditional fees (2%) every year. And given the incestuous relationships among the top quartile PE funds, there really isn’t much diversification that comes with each the new commitments, esepcially if every pension wants to invest in top quartile PE funds. So why not use the $20m a year of fees to hire the same investment advisors/bankers that PE funds hire, and do a deal or two yourself? Afterall, a number of pension funds outside the US have been doing it for years, notably in East Asia.

Comments are closed.