Bailout Incrementalism Continues

According to the WSJ, Treasury and the Fed are considering two big ideas. The first is to create a new state-owned "bad bank" to buy up toxic assets — TARP I, essentially, rebranded. The second is to institutionalize the deals given Citi and BofA, so that anybody can get them.

But where is nationalization? It’s a better idea than either of these, because it gives the government more upside and also more control — both over management decisions and over the degree to which the banks are actually lending.

Anecdotally, even anti-big-government Republicans are coming around to this way of thinking: more half-measures simply aren’t going to work, and if we are going to end up nationalizing, better we do it sooner than later. So I wonder do why the nationalization option never made it into the WSJ story. If it’s been rejected as an option, I’d love to know why.

This entry was posted in bailouts. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Bailout Incrementalism Continues

  1. fgdf says:

    The world’s top luxury,gorgeous,fun.

    for a woman,Exudes a fatal attraction


    all in there.

Comments are closed.