Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Contest

A quick quiz for anybody who's not Todd Gibson. What connects:

  • The King James Bible
  • The Wizard of Oz (the movie, not the book)
  • The UN Secretariat building in New York?

A special treat to whomever is first with the answer I'm thinking of.

Posted by Felix at 21:18 EST

Comments

flying monkeys, natch.

Posted by: mike d at 6:25 EST, May 04, 2006

That's a fantastic answer, Mike. Not the one I was looking for, but fantastic nonetheless.

Posted by: Felix at 7:30 EST, May 04, 2006

They all are, or make references to, a city on a hill.

Posted by: Matthew at 9:18 EST, May 04, 2006

That, Matthew, by contrast, is just weak. You might as well say that they're all concerned in one way or another with natural disasters.

Posted by: Felix at 9:49 EST, May 04, 2006

It wasn't that bad; I suspect you don't get the significance of the term.

Posted by: Matthew at 10:04 EST, May 04, 2006

I know. They all came in over budget.

Posted by: Stefan at 18:29 EST, May 04, 2006

I know the answer. I know the answer. But I'm not telling.

I've got another quiz-type question. Does anyone know why Felix's recent posts are done in bullet point format?

Posted by: Todd Gibson at 19:47 EST, May 04, 2006

Ooo, ooo, it's aaaaaaart and I bet it has something to do with large, randomly spaced blocks of concrete, steel and other leftover bits of airport scattered around a desert somewhere.

Posted by: Matthew at 10:43 EST, May 05, 2006

OK, I'll give you a hint. You know those large pieces of concrete in Marfa? They're, like, the opposite of the answer I'm looking for here. In a weird way, Matthew, you really couldn't be more wrong.

Posted by: Felix at 11:16 EST, May 05, 2006

They were designed by committee?

Posted by: 99 at 17:03 EST, May 05, 2006

So the opposite of big blocks of concrete would be... little blocks of... brick. Yellow bricks, about the shape of the King James bible, used to build the side walls of the UN Secretariat building, making them vertical yellow brick roads, sort of.

Posted by: Stefan at 17:25 EST, May 05, 2006

Not being a friend of Dorothy, as it were, I'm a bit stumped by what could be so different about the movie and book versions of Oz to cause you to draw the distinction.

Posted by: Matthew at 17:39 EST, May 05, 2006

It seems to me that most of Matthew's online life of late has consisted, in some form or another, of his demonstrating or asserting his heterosexuality. But I can assure you all that such an orientation is no obstacle in this particular case.

Posted by: Felix at 10:03 EST, May 06, 2006

invisible, omnipotent power

Posted by: Jason at 10:29 EST, May 06, 2006

superficial omniscience

Posted by: Jason at 10:30 EST, May 06, 2006

This page says the UN, the Wizard of Oz and King James were all "Crown Templars". Which just goes to show you can find anything on google, but that doesn't mean it's right.

http://www.worldnewsstand.net/history/The_Crown_Temple.htm

Posted by: Matthew at 12:02 EST, May 06, 2006

Unicorns.

Posted by: Stefan Geens at 15:19 EST, May 06, 2006

Felix, you presume too much. I only meant it to mean that I'm not so familiar with the movie to know why you'd cite it specifically, instead of the book.

Posted by: Matthew at 10:17 EST, May 07, 2006

It's unicorns, isn't it? I knew it.

Posted by: Stefan at 15:15 EST, May 07, 2006

actually- i think the big difference between the book and the movie is that in the book, the slippers are silver, not ruby? (the all-knowing Wikipedia of Oz seems to agree) so i'd say the answer is "fabulous footwear", but i doubt the UN's wingtips would make

Posted by: mike d at 12:37 EST, May 08, 2006

...the cut.

Posted by: mike d at 12:45 EST, May 08, 2006

Well? Well? What is it?

Posted by: Matthew at 9:06 EST, May 10, 2006

Post a comment




Remember Me?


(you may use HTML tags for style)

Search felixsalmon.com:
A blog about finance and economics, mostly, by Felix Salmon in New York City. Email me.

Felix Salmon: Recent posts

Felix's del.icio.us links

Archives