Notes on London

1. The wastebins are back! The wastebins are back! Finally, that empty bottle of Oasis Classic Lemon which you drank while walking down the street has somewhere to go! I can’t remember exactly when it was that they went – certainly the IRA was bombing for quite a while before the drastic decision was taken – but boy, am I happy for their return. It’s made central London cleaner, too, not that it was filthy before.

2. London vs New York: New Yorkers are better looking. Londoners aren’t exactly ugly, but they tend to be a bit quirkier: bigger noses, odd features, that sort of thing. In New York everybody looks like a model (and most of them are, it turns out); London is more individualistic. Corollary: Londoners are more stylish. They’re not competing on legginess and perfection, but they are competing on coolness, stylishness, funkiness. They get away with a lot more in terms of what they wear and how they look, and in general the (younger) population is refreshingly diverse to look at. London hasn’t been Gap-ified yet, thankfully.

3a. Old London/Old England: It still exists. I went over for the opera; specifically, I went over for Glyndebourne. And while certain parts of London, like New York or Paris or Helsinki or Singapore, have been taken over by the Internationally Wealthy, the sort of people who jet from this hotel to that island with their Louis Vuitton bags and their Gucci loafers, Glyndebourne is still a bastion of the old upper classes, English gents and ladies with plummy accents and precious little dress sense who have seen their effortless superiority turn into effortless irrelevance, yet who still seem completely unruffled by the transformation.

3b. Encounter With The Abovementioned OL/OE: My mother took me aside while we were at Glyndebourne, and told me that my shirt was lovely, but really she didn’t think that she’d be able to continue ironing it for much longer. My dress shirts were inherited from my grandfather, who’d had them made at Sulka on Bond Street. They are thirty years old now, and the collars are a bit wrinkled and difficult to iron. I had a brainstorm: I’d take them into Sulka, if it was still there, and ask them to replace the collar. My father reckoned that they’d do that, and said that Sulka was still on Old Bond Street. Surely it would be cheaper than buying new dress shirts of similar quality, and it would help preserve some sort of connection with OL/OE.
Turns out my father was wrong: Sulka no longer exists, on Bond Street or anywhere else. The venerable marque was taken over by the House of Dunhill at some point in the relatively recent past; I’m not sure if Dunhill itself isn’t part of LVMH or somesuch conglomerate. But all was not lost. I walked into what used to be the Sulka shop (it’s now a Dunhill shop) on Old Bond Street, and asked if they still had Sulka shirts. It was a lazy Tuesday morning, and I think I was the only customer. A man directed me to a woman, who told me that no, Sulka has been done away with entirely. But, she said, they did still have a Master Shirt Maker, whom they’d inherited from Sulka… if I would just step this way and take a seat, she’d bring him up and he’d see what he could do.
Eventually, a sixtyish guy in a sleeveless t-shirt and drawstring trousers came up and introduced himself; I’ve forgotten his name, although I think it was David something. He explained all manner of interesting things about shirts and collars, tutted at the collar on the Hilditch & Key shirt I was wearing – completely wrong for my head shape, or something – and agreed to do the work; he’d replace the cuffs as well. He also told me that they do still make shirts like that, which start at about £220. So £25 for a collar and £25 for a pair of cuffs doesn’t seem half bad, really.

Posted by Felix at 1:50 EST